Taslima Nasreen, the controversial Bangladeshi author living in exile in India has had enough in that country. She was first driven out of Kolkata in September 2007 because of a movement by Islamic extremists and communist sympathizers demanding expulsion of Taslima from India. The Intelligence Bureau kept her in a ’safe house’ within a National Security Guards complex in Delhi.
But this recluse had taken toll on her. India’s External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee assured Nasreen a “shelter” in India on conditions and Taslima apparently had to agree to a compromise formula. On November 30, 2007 Taslima agreed to remove three pages from her book Dwikhondito (Split up into two). The book has been criticized by Muslims as “anti-Islamic”. (BBC and wikipedia)
On 20 January 2008 she wrote a poem which was published in The Statesman of Calcutta:
Was a poet ever kept in house arrest?
May be she has been a subject of politicking
True she caused clashes once in a while
May be an arson, too.
But no, a poet was never taken to safe custody.
This India, this civilization, this 21st century
They all had welcomed the poet
Ignoring its childish religionism, its merciless politics.
But today, the poet languishes in house arrest.
She has done no offense.
On 11 March 2008, Taslima Nasreen wrote in Mukto-mona, an internet activism group:
Where am I? I am certain no one will believe me if I say I have no answer to this apparently straightforward question, but the truth is I just do not know.
What crime have I committed that I have to spend my life hidden away, relegated to the shadows? For what crimes am I being punished by this society, this land? I wrote of my beliefs and my convictions. I used words, not violence, to express my ideas. I did not take recourse to pelting stones or bloodshed to make my point. Yet, I am considered a criminal. I am being persecuted because it was felt that the right of others to express their opinions was more legitimate than mine.
I know I have not been condemned by the masses. If their opinion had been sought, I am certain the majority would have wanted me to stay on in Bengal. But when has a democracy reflected the voice of the masses? A democracy is run by those who hold the reins of power, who do exactly what they think fit.
And finally she decides to quit India. In an email to IANS she writes:
I used to call this the torture chamber. I gradually came to realise that it was the chamber of death instead. I was not even allowed to stay in hospital for long though the doctors felt it was necessary in order to stabilise my blood pressure.
Even though they constantly pressured me mentally to leave the country, I refused to budge. I was determined I would not leave this country. When they saw it was pointless trying to destroy my mind, they attempted to destroy my body. In this they succeeded by ruining my health, which leaves me with no other alternative but to leave this country.
(Image courtesy: Wikipedia)
Mate, i thought secularism meant tolerance and giving people the right to express themselves even if you feel contrary to what they do. And you always have the freedom to give a damn to what they say or even refute them. But you just can’t tell ’em to not express what they feel. This is what the Freedom of Expression and Thought is all about. And i personally feel, we are fortunate enough to be in India, and also being to be able to exercise this fundamental right of ours. Look at what happened in Pakistan when blogs against the government were taken down were taken down and the press brutally put down. The Indian government, not letting Taslima live in India, is indirectly tantamount to curbing freedom of expression!!!
I meant the Indian Government is almost behaving like Pakistan by denying Taslima a place here, in this country. By the line ”behaving like Pakistan”, i meant the times in the recent past when Pakistan’s president Pervez Musharraf didn’t let bloggers and the Pakistani media express themselves and imposed heavy curbs on them. i’l be very glad if i have clarified myself DeshBhai. LoL
See, here case is not of giving shelter and later denying, rather the question is why should we give shelter to her??? Why again?? I may sound a bit freak but being an Indian I strictly believe that we could not afford to give shelter every person here. this is the sheer idiotic Indian politics that runs amuck that I always failed to understand, as I cited above.
Secondly, if we are that much bothered about Taslima’s refuge then why we didn’t hide Saddam here or Osama bin laden for that matter? since the case of saddam is late now but option for laden is still open? LOLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZ
It is highly embarrassing for Indian citizens like me to see such a despicable act committed by current Indian ruling party politicians and its strange bedfellows - the communists.
Then why don’t you ask why India harbours the Dalai Lama? You might as well pose such questions.
I have an answer straight from an eighth standard civics textbook, Because India is a Secular country.
And i would like to ask you a question, how can you even compare Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussain to Taslima Nasreen. If you can answer that, we can further this debate!!!LoL
i agree india cannot afford to give shelter to more people. in fact, one more person taking shelter in india would be like the proverbial last straw that breaks the camel's back.
now how would explain the millions of bangladeshi infiltrators who are systematically regularized as indian citizens right along the india-bangladesh border in west bengal? because they form a sizable vote bank for the communists. the congress did exactly the same in the border areas of assam. situation is such now that indians in those areas have become minorities to those illegal immigrants who now claim to be indian citizens with proper documentation.
don't comment on something like an expert on a subject that you don't know much about.
Bang on!!! well said mate, even that is an issue. When India can harbour thousands of Bangladeshi refugees, why can’t we, i mean the Indian government, let a prominent writer who dares to speak her mind, live here in our country???
First of all thanks for citing Dalai Lama and again the question remains why should we shelter, but here comes again my friend Jay with his argument of secularism. But my friend why don’t you understand that we can not propagate secularism for all the asylum seekers. though I firmly believe in secularism for all irrespective of religion or caste but we can’t judge different ppl with the different sticks. IF we’ll be having that much high feeling of philanthropy, egalitarianism, then we need thousands of charity institutes and refugee camps and I hope you won’t mind to contribute with both hands. What say?????lolzzzzzzzzz.
And the case you cited, on the basis of that Osama Bin Laden and late Saddam deserve the same on secular grounds, if being secular then why India banished M. F Hussain???? doesn’t he deserve the freedom of expression???
Yeah, i agree i forgot to add M.F Hussain DeshBhai. So what are you trying to say, We have to keep repeating the mistake we have been making. Torturing Taslima Nasreen by house arresting her when she needed medical attention and now banishing her is wrong and i firmly stand by what i said before. Do you think Osama did us all a favour by bombing the WTC and did Saddam not kill millions of his own country people in Iraq? What did Taslima do for you to compare her with the aforementioned sadistic creatures?
She just expressed her thoughts on Islam which might have hurt other people, but that doesn’t mean she can be equated to Osama and Saddam. Where is the right to expression? If that was missing, we couldn’t be here sitting and debating this issue,.,.And talking about charity, i really wouldn’t mind sparing a few bucks for the needy, which in this case would be the Bangladeshi refugees. And i recollect hearing stories about Indian students having collected money for Bangladeshi Independence by polishing shoes,.,so what does all this imply..,We are a bunch of secular people and our government has let us down by not giving Taslima Nasreen and M.F Hussain their creative space and this has left an indelible black mark on our claim of being a secular nation.
I agree. It is the world’s loss.
Local Opinions (5)
Global Opinions (39)
Mate, i thought secularism meant tolerance and giving people the right to express themselves even if you feel contrary to what they do. And you always have the freedom to give a damn to what they say or even refute them. But you just can’t tell ’em to not express what they feel. This is what the Freedom of Expression and Thought is all about. And i personally feel, we are fortunate enough to be in India, and also being to be able to exercise this fundamental right of ours. Look at what happened in Pakistan when blogs against the government were taken down were taken down and the press brutally put down. The Indian government, not letting Taslima live in India, is indirectly tantamount to curbing freedom of expression!!!
I meant the Indian Government is almost behaving like Pakistan by denying Taslima a place here, in this country. By the line ”behaving like Pakistan”, i meant the times in the recent past when Pakistan’s president Pervez Musharraf didn’t let bloggers and the Pakistani media express themselves and imposed heavy curbs on them. i’l be very glad if i have clarified myself DeshBhai. LoL
See, here case is not of giving shelter and later denying, rather the question is why should we give shelter to her??? Why again?? I may sound a bit freak but being an Indian I strictly believe that we could not afford to give shelter every person here. this is the sheer idiotic Indian politics that runs amuck that I always failed to understand, as I cited above.
Secondly, if we are that much bothered about Taslima’s refuge then why we didn’t hide Saddam here or Osama bin laden for that matter? since the case of saddam is late now but option for laden is still open? LOLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZ
It is highly embarrassing for Indian citizens like me to see such a despicable act committed by current Indian ruling party politicians and its strange bedfellows - the communists.
Then why don’t you ask why India harbours the Dalai Lama? You might as well pose such questions.
I have an answer straight from an eighth standard civics textbook, Because India is a Secular country.
And i would like to ask you a question, how can you even compare Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussain to Taslima Nasreen. If you can answer that, we can further this debate!!!LoL
i agree india cannot afford to give shelter to more people. in fact, one more person taking shelter in india would be like the proverbial last straw that breaks the camel's back.
now how would explain the millions of bangladeshi infiltrators who are systematically regularized as indian citizens right along the india-bangladesh border in west bengal? because they form a sizable vote bank for the communists. the congress did exactly the same in the border areas of assam. situation is such now that indians in those areas have become minorities to those illegal immigrants who now claim to be indian citizens with proper documentation.
don't comment on something like an expert on a subject that you don't know much about.
Bang on!!! well said mate, even that is an issue. When India can harbour thousands of Bangladeshi refugees, why can’t we, i mean the Indian government, let a prominent writer who dares to speak her mind, live here in our country???
First of all thanks for citing Dalai Lama and again the question remains why should we shelter, but here comes again my friend Jay with his argument of secularism. But my friend why don’t you understand that we can not propagate secularism for all the asylum seekers. though I firmly believe in secularism for all irrespective of religion or caste but we can’t judge different ppl with the different sticks. IF we’ll be having that much high feeling of philanthropy, egalitarianism, then we need thousands of charity institutes and refugee camps and I hope you won’t mind to contribute with both hands. What say?????lolzzzzzzzzz.
And the case you cited, on the basis of that Osama Bin Laden and late Saddam deserve the same on secular grounds, if being secular then why India banished M. F Hussain???? doesn’t he deserve the freedom of expression???
Yeah, i agree i forgot to add M.F Hussain DeshBhai. So what are you trying to say, We have to keep repeating the mistake we have been making. Torturing Taslima Nasreen by house arresting her when she needed medical attention and now banishing her is wrong and i firmly stand by what i said before. Do you think Osama did us all a favour by bombing the WTC and did Saddam not kill millions of his own country people in Iraq? What did Taslima do for you to compare her with the aforementioned sadistic creatures?
She just expressed her thoughts on Islam which might have hurt other people, but that doesn’t mean she can be equated to Osama and Saddam. Where is the right to expression? If that was missing, we couldn’t be here sitting and debating this issue,.,.And talking about charity, i really wouldn’t mind sparing a few bucks for the needy, which in this case would be the Bangladeshi refugees. And i recollect hearing stories about Indian students having collected money for Bangladeshi Independence by polishing shoes,.,so what does all this imply..,We are a bunch of secular people and our government has let us down by not giving Taslima Nasreen and M.F Hussain their creative space and this has left an indelible black mark on our claim of being a secular nation.
I agree. It is the world’s loss.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 































